The accumulation of special retirements for health professionals in Brazil's own systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00020.11Keywords:
Aposentadoria Especial, Cumulação, Regimes ´Próprios de Previdência Social, BrasilAbstract
This text proposes a solution to a controversial issue in Brazil's Social Security Systems: the (im)possibility of accumulating special retirements for those who hold two public positions as health professionals with regulated professions (hypothesis). In such cases, would the treatment given by the Federal Supreme Court within the General Social Security System be appropriate, since it decided that the legal prohibition on the accumulation of special retirements was constitutional (objectives)? All the material collected for bibliographical and documentary analysis was analyzed from a positivist-rationalist and hermeneutic point of view (methodology used). It was noted that the remaining distinctions between the different social security systems that coexist in Brazil justify, despite the continuous approximation between them, a different legal solution about the (im)possibility of accumulating special retirements (results achieved). In view of the traditional methods of interpretation – historical, teleological and systematic – as well as the methods of constitutional interpretation – supremacy of the constitution and unity of the constitution – the conclusion is that the accumulation of special pensions for those occupying public positions as health professionals in regulated professions within the scope of the Social Security Schemes is constitutional (final considerations).
Downloads
References
Brasil, Assembleia Nacional Constituinte, Constituição Federal, de 05 de outubro de 1988, Disponível em, http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm, Acesso em, 05.07.2022.
Brasil, Congresso Nacional, Lei n. 8.213, de 24 de julho de 1991 (Lei dos Planos de Benefícios da Previdência Social), Disponível em, https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8213cons.htm?hsCtaTracking=8dbf00ec-3047-42cb-bdec-5135b6af0ce5%7C75c3cf15-d229-48dd-ad4a-7c2ca608a1d7, Acesso em, 31.07.2024.
Brasil, Supremo Tribunal Federal, Recurso Extraordinário repetitivo n. 791.961-PR (Tema 709), Disponível em, https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudenciaRepercussao/verAndamentoProcesso.asp?incidente=4518055&numeroProcesso=791961&classeProcesso=RE&numeroTema=709, Acesso em, 31.07.2024.
Brasil, Supremo Tribunal Federal, Súmula Vinculante n. 33, Disponível em, https://portal.stf.jus.br/jurisprudencia/sumariosumulas.asp?base=26&sumula=1941#:~:text=A%20aposentadoria%20especial%20de%20servidor,lei%20complementar%20exigida%20pelo%20art, Acesso em, 31.07.2024.
Castro, Carlos Alberto Pereira de; Lazzari, João Batista. Manual de direito previdenciário, 26 ed., Rio de Janeiro, Forense, 2023.
Horvath Júnior, Miguel, Direito Previdenciário, 13ª ed., São Paulo, Rideel, 2022.
Lamy, Marcelo, Metodologia da pesquisa: técnicas de investigação, argumentação e redação, 2ª ed., rev., atual. e ampl., São Paulo, Matrioska Editora, 2020.
Lamy, Marcelo, Oliveira, Danilo de, Sistema brasileiro de precedentes judiciais, 1. ed., São Paulo, EDSC, 2024.
Martins, Bruno Sá Freira, A nova previdência dos servidores públicos, 1ª ed., Curitiba, Alteridade, 2021.
Oliveira, Danilo de, Hermenêutica do desenvolvimento, São Paulo, Matrioska Editora, 2023.
Paraná, Diário Eletrônico do Tribunal de Contas do Estado do Paraná (TCE-PR), Processo n. 700164/19, Acórdão n. 1894/21, Consulta do Instituto de Previdência dos Servidores Públicos do Município de Cascavel, Ano XVI, n. 2.640, 17.08.2021, terça-feira, págs. 14-15 de 68.
Soares, Ricardo Maurício Freire, Hermenêutica e Interpretação Jurídica, 3ª ed., rev., ampl. e atual, São Paulo, Saraiva, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 DANILO DE OLIVEIRA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
For universalization and free sharing of knowledge, CONSINTER Journal is indexed under the Creative Commons 4.0 License
Attribution – Non-Commercial Use – Sharing by the same 4.0 Brazil license.
It’s allowed:
– Copy, distribute, display and execute the work
– Create derivative works
Under the following conditions:
ATTRIBUTION
You must give credit to the original author, as specified by the author or licensor.
NON-COMMERCIAL USE
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
SHARING BY THE SAME LICENSE
If you change, transform, or create another work based on it, you may only distribute the resulting work under a license identical to this one.
For each new use or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms for this work.
Legal License (full license): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.pt_BR