La Doctrina Sobre los Límites a los Derechos y Libertades en el Marco del Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Especial Referencia al Caso Sas C. Francia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00004.07Keywords:
European Court of Human Rights, limits to rights and freedoms, Islamic veilAbstract
This article contains a systematic study of the application by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) of the proportionality judgment in cases assessing the limitations imposed by States on rights and freedoms. The article places particular emphasis on the study of the collective purposes envisaged by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which would justify a restriction of one of the rights. In particular, the application of the concept of public morality, national security and the clause relating to the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. Regarding the protection of the rights and freedoms of others, the contribution asses its application in SAS c. France (2015), a case about the limitation of the integral Islamic veil in public spaces.
Downloads
References
Alaéz Corral, Benito, “Reflexiones jurídico-constitucionales sobre la prohibición del velo integral en Europa”, en Teoría y realidad constitucional, núm. 28, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.28.2011.6969
Aileen McHarg, Reconciling Human Rights and the Public Interest: Conceptual Problems and Doctrinal Uncertainty in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. The Modern Law Review. vol. 62, núm 5, p. 671-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00231
Brems Eva (et alt) “Uncovering French and Belgian Face Covering Bans”, Journal of law religion and State, núm 2, 2013, p.85-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22124810-00201004
Concil of Europe, National security and European Case Law. Concil of Europe, 2013
Costas Trascasas Mumanos (TEDHia del T. 5 de CEDH ideraciones de seguridad nacional, reconociendo en consecuencia una exesiva libertad del Estado ilena, Seguridad nacional y derechos humanos en la reciente jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos (TEDH) en materia de terrorismo internacional: ¿hacia un nuevo equilibrio?”, en Conde Perez Elena e Iglesias Sara, “Terrorismo y legalidad internacional”, Madrid, Dixon, 2012, p. 187-207.
Khan Astifa., “A “Right Not to be Offended” Under Article 10(2) ECHR? Concerns in the construction of the “Rights od Others”, European Human Rights Law Review, Issue 2, 2012, p. 191-202.
Martínez-Bascuñán Ramírez, Maria, “Opinión pública y democracia deliberativa: el ejemplo del velo islámico en Francia”, Revista Española de Ciencia Política, núm. 34, 2014, p. 67-88.
Prieto Sanchís, Luis, “La limitación de los derechos fundamentales y la norma de clausura del sistema de libertades”, en Derechos y libertades, Revista del Instituto Bartolomé de las Casas, núm. 8, 2000, p.429-468.
Perrone Roberto, Public Morals and the ECHR, Univeristy of Leicester School of Law, Reserach Paper, Nº14-02. 2017.
Ponce Solé Juli, ¿Hacia un nuevo concepto europeo de orden público? A propósito de la sentencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos de 2014 sobre el burka: ¿obligación jurídica de vivir juntos o derecho a autoexcluirse y ser un outsider?, en Revista Española de Derecho Administrativo, núm 170, 2015, p. 215-240.
Roza Pati, Rights and Their Limits: The Constitution for Europe in International and Comparative Legal Perspective, Berkeley Journal International Law, vol. 3, núm. 1, 2005, p. 223-280.
Shachar, Ayelet. Multicultural jurisdictions, cultural differences and women’s Rights, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490330
Solozaval Echavarria, J.J., “Algunas cuestiones básicas de la teoría de los derechos fundamentales”, Revista de Estudios Políticos, núm. 71, 1991.
Tourkochoriti Ioanna, The Burka Ban before the European Court of Human Rights: A Comment on S.A.S. v. France, Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9 de julio de 2014.
Tulkens De Schutter, Oliver y Tulkens, Françoise., “Rights in Conflict: the European Court of Human Rights as a pragmatic institution”, Eva Brems (ed.) Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights, Antwerp/Oxford, 2008.
Yusuf, Hakeen “SAS v. France. Supporting ‘living together’ or Forced Assimilation?”, International Human Rights Review, núm. 3, 2014, p.277-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-00302006
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Natalia Caicedo Camacho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
For universalization and free sharing of knowledge, CONSINTER Journal is indexed under the Creative Commons 4.0 License
Attribution – Non-Commercial Use – Sharing by the same 4.0 Brazil license.
It’s allowed:
– Copy, distribute, display and execute the work
– Create derivative works
Under the following conditions:
ATTRIBUTION
You must give credit to the original author, as specified by the author or licensor.
NON-COMMERCIAL USE
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
SHARING BY THE SAME LICENSE
If you change, transform, or create another work based on it, you may only distribute the resulting work under a license identical to this one.
For each new use or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms for this work.
Legal License (full license): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.pt_BR
