Uma Abordagem da Administração Pública Brasileira e do Estado Administrativo Norte-Americano, sob uma Teoria de Enfraquecimento do Poder da Lei nos EUA: a Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS) Brasileira, Deferência e Legalidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.0007.07Keywords:
State, Business and management Public Administration, Regulatory agencies, Normative power, HealthAbstract
This legal article begins with the approach of the principle of legality, its relations and unfolding linked to the Regulatory Agencies figure, with the background examination of the Brazilian Public Administration consolidated from the middle of the last decade of the twentieth century. In a second stage, and from clear theoretical references, that are specifics studies of Adrian Vermeule and other Authors about the US Administrative State and the Public Administration in Brazil, the article has used a qualitative deductive method, based on modern and contemporary theories, as well as on Brazilian jurisprudential decisions, to be able to proceed a specific examination of the role of the Legislative, Judiciary Powers and, in the Executive scope, of the National Supplementary Health Agency (ANS – initials, in Portuguese), from which are based the examples used to establish and demonstrate the idea of lower or higher deference, in Brazil and in the United States of America, to the administrative technicity.
Downloads
References
ARAGÃO, Alexandre Santos de. Agências reguladoras e a evolução do direito administrativo econômico. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2002.
BARROSO, Luís Roberto. Temas de Direito Constitucional. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2002.
BINENBOJM, Gustavo. Uma teoria do Direito Administrativo: direitos fundamentais, democracia e constitucionalização. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2008.
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Pleno. AgInt no AREsp 919368. Rel. Min. Marco Buzzi. Brasília, j. em 25.10.2016. DJe em 07.11.2016.
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Pleno. AgRg no AREsp 845190. Rel. Min. Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva. Brasília, j. em 16.06.2016. DJe em 28.06.2016.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Pleno. ADin-MC 1.668/DF. Rel. Min. Marco Aurélio. Brasília, j. em 20.08.1998. DJ 31.08.1998.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. ADin-MC 1.668/DF. Trecho do voto do Ministro Sepúlveda Pertence, 1998.
MORAES, Alexandre de. Constituição do Brasil interpretada. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.
MORAES, Germana de Oliveira. Controle jurisdicional da Administração Pública. São Paulo: Dialética, 1999.
MOREIRA NETO, Diogo de Figueiredo. Mutações do Direito Administrativo. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2001.
PAMPLONA, Danielle Anne. Devido processo legal – aspecto material. Curitiba: Juruá, 2004.
PIETRO, Maria Sylvia Zanella Di. Discricionariedade administrativa na Constituição de 1988. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2001.
SOUTO, Macos Juruena Villela. Desestatização, privatização, concessões e terceirizações. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2000.
SUNSTEIN, Cass R. O constitucionalismo após o New Deal. In: MATTOS, Paulo (Coord.). Regulação econômica e democracia: o debate norte-americano. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2004.
SUNSTEIN, Cass R., VERMEULE, Adrian. Interpretation and Institutions (July 2002). U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 156; U Chicago Public Law Research Paper No. 28. Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=320245 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.320245>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.320245
VERMEULE, Adrian. Law’s abnegation: from Law’s Empire to the Administrative State. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674974739
_____. The Constitution of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
_____. The Atrophy of Constitutional Powers. (January 6, 2011). Harvard Public Law Working Paper n. 11-07. Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1736124>; <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736124>.
_____. The system of the Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2011.
_____. Law and limits of reason. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2009.
_____. Mechanisms of democracy – Institutional Design Writ Small. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2007.
_____. Judging under uncertainty: an institutional theory of legal interpretation. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Luigi Bonizzato, Alice Ribas Dias Bonizzato
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
For universalization and free sharing of knowledge, CONSINTER Journal is indexed under the Creative Commons 4.0 License
Attribution – Non-Commercial Use – Sharing by the same 4.0 Brazil license.
It’s allowed:
– Copy, distribute, display and execute the work
– Create derivative works
Under the following conditions:
ATTRIBUTION
You must give credit to the original author, as specified by the author or licensor.
NON-COMMERCIAL USE
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
SHARING BY THE SAME LICENSE
If you change, transform, or create another work based on it, you may only distribute the resulting work under a license identical to this one.
For each new use or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms for this work.
Legal License (full license): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.pt_BR