Doubt as a premise for an upright defence of rights. Critical view of cartesian philosophy

Authors

  • Jesús Víctor Alfredo Contreras Ugarte Profesor de Filosofía del Derecho, Derechos Humanos, Fundamentos Teóricos del Derecho y Habilidades Básicas del Jurista: Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Doctor Sobresaliente Cum Laude en Derechos Humanos, Máster en Derechos Humanos, Máster en Derechos Fundamentales, Especialista en Educación para la Ciudadanía y los Derechos Humanos: Instituto de Derechos Humanos ‘Bartolomé de las Casas’, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Especialista con Matrícula de Honor en Derechos Humanos: Instituto de Derechos Humanos Complutense, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Licenciado en Derecho: Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de San Martín de Porres. Académico Correspondiente de la Real Academia de Jurisprudencia y Legislación de España. Académico de Número de la Sociedad Española de Retórica. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9148-659X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00016.03

Keywords:

Descartes, doubt, rights, submission, critique

Abstract

We are living in times that show us a society that is too much, too much, abhorred and gregarious, comfortable, gullible, manipulable and directed towards its own admiration of its own intellectual disdain. To think critically about something today is not freely accepted by the official and factual powers who apply censorship with total impudence if the opinion expressed warns us of their calculated and dishonest intentions. Thus, we face a reality where either you think, repeat and abide by what they tell you to think, repeat and abide by, or you are stigmatized and persecuted as a social misfit (unsupportive, facist, ultra, sexist, homophobic, denialist, etc.). Any attempt to think differently, critically and objectively, if it goes against what is planned by the current powers, this is repressed through immediate censorship. The aim is to turn people into a submissive mass, obedient and happily subjugated to the external powers; the aim is to turn into accomplices of evil all that distracted and not very hard-working mass that seems not to be interested in the truth in their lives nor in the harm that can be done to them or their children. It is about making us live in society subjugated to an authority that is not our own understanding. Hannah Arendt said that daring to insert the self into the world and to begin a personal history is the power that philosophy fosters. Therefore, the best antidote to this social evil we face is to look again at the philosophy of rights. As such, the gaze we choose in this article, we look to René Descartes, whom, by the way, Hegel called a 'hero of thought'. Although with the nuances and criticisms that are developed in this work, the truth is that Descartes had the greatness of daring to question all the knowledge of his time, he dared to doubt everything. And this is not trivial, since those were times of the Holy Inquisition and the censorship of everything that was written; moreover, not long before, Giordano Bruno had been burned alive. Despite all this, Descartes had the courage to remove, with his works, that reality that forced the acceptance of a single truth and which few, if any, dared to challenge. I will begin by using a descriptive method and then, especially in the criticisms, I will prescribe my point of view on Cartesian philosophy, ending with its pertinent relation to law.
Keywords: Descartes, doubt, rights, submission, critique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Minutos. (14 de julio de 2021). Las tres veces que el Constitucional ha tumbado una decisión de Sánchez. Madrid, Madrid, España: 20 Minutos. Recuperado el 09 de agosto de 2022, de https://www.20minutos.es/noticia/4764292/0/las-tres-veces-que-el-constitucional-ha-tumbado-una-decision-de-sanchez/

BALMES, J. (1925). Filosofía fundamental (Vol. III). Barcelona: Balmes.

BRAGUE, R. (2022). Las anclas en el cielo. (J. M. Millán, Trad.) Madrid: Encuentro.

BRUNSCHVICG, L. (1939). Descartes. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.

BUSTAMANTE ZAMUDIO, G. (2008). Los tres principios de la lógica aristótelica: ¿son del mundo o del hablar? Folios(27), 24-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17227/01234870.27folios24.30

DAMASIO, A. (1996). EL error de Descartes. (J. Ros, Trad.) Barcelona: Crítica.

DESCARTES, R. (1980). Tratado del hombre. (G. Quintas, Trad.) Madrid: Nacional.

DESCARTES, R. (1988). Meditaciones metafísicas. (M. G. Morente, Trad.) Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

DESCARTES, R. (1994). Discurso del método. (E. Frutos, Trad.) Barcelona: RBA.

DESCARTES, R. (2011). Las pasiones del alma. (F. F. Buey, Trad.) Madrid: Gredos.

DESCARTES, R. (2020). Correspondencia sobre la moral y la libertad. (P. Lomba, Trad.) Madrid: Tecnos.

FRAILE, G. (2011). Historia de la filosofía. Del Humanismo a la Ilustración (Vol. III). Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.

GARCÍA PAZ, D. (4 de agosto de 2022). René Descartes: el método aplicado al derecho. Recuperado el 9 de agosto de 2022, de La Reconstrucción: https://lareconstruccion.com/rene-descartes-el-metodo-aplicado-al-derecho-diego-garcia-paz/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.3610943.3

GONZÁLEZ RÍOS, F. (1950). Descartes. Su mundo moral y religioso. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía.

GRANDE SÁNCHEZ, p. J. (2012). Historia de la ideas filosóficas. Madrid: Ediciones Internacionales Universitarias.

HOFFMANN, A. (1932). Descartes. (E. Imaz, Trad.) Madrid: Revista de Occidente.

ISNARDI, T. (1937). Descartes. La fisisca de Descartes. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenso Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía.

SABOIA DE MEDEIROS, R. (Agosto de 1937). El hombre. Descartes. Estudios. Homenaje a Renato Descartes(57), 369-556.

SHRIER, A. (2021). Un daño irreversible. (M. V. Granados, Trad.) Barcelona: Deusto.

VALÉRY, p. (2005). Descartes, por detrás. (M. M. Sierra, Trad.) Madrid: Losada.

WALSH, M. (12 de julio de 2022). Youtube. (Justin Folk) Recuperado el 12 de agosto de 2022, de https://youtu.be/N0Y93bUIbck

XIOL, J. (2015). Descartes. Un filósofo más allá de toda duda. Barcelona: Batiscafo.

ZARAGOZA, J. (30 de julio de 2022). Rumble. Recuperado el 11 de agosto de 2022, de https://rumble.com/v1egf47-programa-12-temporada-ii-vivir-con-salud-30072022.html

Published

2023-07-14

How to Cite

Ugarte, J. V. A. C. (2023). Doubt as a premise for an upright defence of rights. Critical view of cartesian philosophy. Revista Internacional Consinter De Direito, 9(16), 109. https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00016.03

Issue

Section

Direitos Difusos, Coletivos e Individuais Homogêneos